ArticleBMC public health2026
Physical, chemical and psychological effect of COVID-19 pandemic upon health care providers.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has had profound physical, chemical, and psychological impacts on medical staff worldwide.
objectivesThe study aimed to assess the physical, chemical and psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic and its predicted factors among health care providers. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional study design consist of 105 participants was carried out from 1st May to 30th July, 2023 at Al-Hussein teaching hospital at Al- Nasiriya city, southern Iraq. A Constructed questionnaire consisting of three parts was utilized in this study. The first includes demographic information while Second, concerns with work related variables and third Parts cover the assessment of physical, chemical and psychological Impact.
resultsThe study results indicate that more than half of participants were young adults aged 20 to 29, and predominantly male (58.1%), with 97.1% holding bachelor's degrees and Medical Assistants make up 23.8% of job titles. The findings reveal that 61.0%,of respondents have a moderate effect from the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to physical well-being, with an average score of 19.68 ± 4.39, and55.2% of healthcare providers expressed chemical effect resulting in an average score of 24.65 ± 4.98., Additionally, in terms of psychological effect, 53.3% of respondents indicated experiencing moderate effects, with an average score of 21.22 ± 4.55. Regression analyses found that years of experience predict physical well-being impact (p < 0.0001), while education level and years of experience predict chemical hazard impact (p < 0.0001), and age, gender, and years of experience predict psychological impact (p < 0.0001).
conclusionsThe study highlights the difficulties faced by healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, including physical, chemical, and psychological impacts.To tackle these challenges, personalized strategies that take into account factors like experience, education, age, and gender should be adopted by healthcare Institutions and policymakers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.