SynthesisBMC oral health2026
Effect of virtual reality distraction on children's behavior during dental treatment: a systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDental anxiety in children is common and often disrupts dental treatment. Among various psycho-behavioral strategies, distraction techniques-especially virtual reality (VR) have gained increasing attention due to their immersive potential in managing anxiety during dental procedures.
methodsA literature search was conducted across five databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) for studies published between 2013 and 2023. Only randomized controlled trials and interventional studies assessing VR distraction in pediatric dental settings were included.
resultsOut of 236 identified articles, 15 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 1,168 children aged 4 to 15. Most studies reported improved behavior, reduced anxiety, and lower pain perception with VR distraction compared to standard care.
conclusionVR distraction appears to be a safe and non-invasive approach that may improve the dental experience for children. However, due to methodological heterogeneity and the overall low certainty of evidence, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and further standardized research is needed to confirm its benefits and optimize clinical protocols. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: This systematic review was based on the methodology of the Cochrane review and followed the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metanalyses) guidelines. Before starting this work, the systematic review was declared on the PROSPERO international register of systematic reviews (CRD42023458556) ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ ) to avoid duplication of subject matter by another author. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.