ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Nanotechnology-based formulations of thyme essential oil to enhance its herbicidal efficiency for controlling weeds associated with maize plants.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Essential Oils as Plant-Derived Bioherbicides: Prospects for Sustainable Weed Management-A Narrative Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThyme is an aromatic plant known as a rich source of bioactive compounds with eco-friendly herbicidal potential. Despite the herbicidal potential of thyme essential oil, its effectiveness under field conditions is limited due to its high volatility, poor water solubility and susceptibility to environmental degradation. Nanoformulations can overcome these limitations by enhancing stability, dispersibility, bioavailability, and prolonging herbicidal activity. Hence, this study was applied to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of aqueous extracts from thyme leaves and thyme essential oil against weeds. A preliminary pot experiment tested different concentrations of thyme leaf aqueous extracts (0, 10, 20 and 30% w/v) and thyme essential oil (0, 3, 6 and 9% v/v). Based on these results, two subsequent pot experiments were conducted during two consecutive summer seasons using lower concentrations (0, 2, 4 and 6% v/v) of crude thyme essential oil, its nanoemulsion and β-cyclodextrin nanoencapsulated formulations. Healthy weed-free maize plants and unweeded controls were included for comparison.
resultsThe preliminary experiment revealed that thyme essential oil was more efficient in controlling weeds than aqueous extracts in weed control, where 9% thyme essential oil achieved complete suppression with stimulatory response in maize plants (11.4 g dry biomass) but this stimulatory response was lower than 6 and 3% concentrations (11.9 and 11.5 dry biomass, respectively). In the main experiment, nanoemulsion and β-cyclodextrin significantly outperformed raw essential oil in weed suppression and crop safety. At 90 DAS, NE-Th oil at 6 and 4% achieved the highest reduction in barnyard grass dry weight (83.48 and 81.72%, respectively) and purslane (89.27 and 82.41%, respectively) compared to the unweeded control. Regarding maize plants at 90 DAS, NE-Th oil at 6 and 4% showed the best performance, significantly exceeding the unweeded control dry weight (50.83 and 45.48 g), respectively. These results indicate that nanoformulations not only enhance weed suppression but also improve crop performance under weed stress competition.
conclusionBoth nanoemulsion and β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex formulations enhanced the stability and herbicidal efficiency of thyme oil. Therefore, nanoemulsified thyme oil at 4% and 6% achieved the best balance between effective weed suppression and improved maize growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.