ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
A clinical-radiomics model based on multiparametric MRI for discriminating solitary primary spinal tumors from solitary spinal metastases.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate a clinical-radiomics model based on multiparametric MRI for differentiating solitary primary spinal tumors from solitary spinal metastases.
methodsThis dual-center retrospective study included 510 patients with pathologically confirmed spinal tumors, randomly split into training (n = 328), internal validation (n = 82), and external test (n = 100) cohorts. Radiomics and deep learning features were extracted from T1-weighted, T2-weighted, T2-weighted fat-suppressed, and T1-weighted contrast-enhanced sequences. Three models were constructed and compared: a radiomics model (Rad-M), a deep learning-radiomics fusion model (DRad-M), and a clinical-radiomics model (CRad-M) that integrated radiomics features with patient age. The performance of seven machine learning classifiers was evaluated for each model.
resultsThe CRad-M, utilizing a logistic regression (LR) classifier, demonstrated superior performance, achieving areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.909 and 0.824 on the internal and external test sets, respectively. It significantly outperformed both the Rad-M and DRad-M models (all p < 0.05). The incorporation of deep learning features did not yield a significant improvement over the radiomics-only model. Calibration and decision curve analyses confirmed the robust clinical utility of the CRad-M.
conclusionThe proposed LR-based CRad-M is an effective non-invasive tool for the preoperative differentiation of solitary primary spinal tumors and solitary spinal metastases, with its performance enhanced by the integration of clinical data (age) alongside radiomic features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.