Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42185759›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2026

Combined preoperative PNI and APRI for risk stratification after curative hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Daigoro Takahashi, Atsuyuki Maeda, Hiroki Aoyama, Takamasa Takahashi, Yuichi Takayama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daigoro TakahashiDivision of Digestive Surgery, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, 4-86 Minaminokawa, Ogaki, Gifu, 503-8502, Japan. daigoro-takahashi0424@hotmail.co.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9453-9781
Atsuyuki MaedaDivision of Digestive Surgery, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, 4-86 Minaminokawa, Ogaki, Gifu, 503-8502, Japan.
Hiroki AoyamaDivision of Digestive Surgery, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, 4-86 Minaminokawa, Ogaki, Gifu, 503-8502, Japan.
Takamasa TakahashiDivision of Digestive Surgery, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, 4-86 Minaminokawa, Ogaki, Gifu, 503-8502, Japan.
Yuichi TakayamaDivision of Digestive Surgery, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, 4-86 Minaminokawa, Ogaki, Gifu, 503-8502, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-term outcomes after curative hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain heterogeneous, yet simple preoperative tools for postoperative risk stratification are limited. We investigated whether combining representative inflammation/nutrition- and fibrosis-related markers could improve pragmatic risk stratification after hepatectomy.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 343 consecutive patients who underwent curative hepatectomy for primary HCC between June 2010 and November 2020 at a single tertiary center. Preoperative laboratory data obtained within 4 weeks before surgery were used to calculate candidate inflammation-based scores and fibrosis markers. Cut-offs were derived using receiver operating characteristic analysis for 5-year mortality. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for a prespecified clinical covariate set. Discrimination, calibration, and bootstrap internal validation were also evaluated.

resultsIn separate multivariable models using the same clinical adjustment set, low prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and high aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) were independently associated with worse OS and RFS. A combined PNI-APRI classification stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with 5-year OS rates of 82.5%, 74.5%, and 49.7%, respectively, and 5-year RFS rates of 47.7%, 38.2%, and 18.6%, respectively. Compared with the low-risk group, the adjusted hazard ratio for the high-risk group was 2.72 for OS and 2.12 for RFS. Adding the composite classification to the base clinical model improved the C-index from 0.703 to 0.722 for OS and from 0.634 to 0.648 for RFS. Calibration was acceptable, and optimism-corrected C-index values after bootstrap internal validation were 0.705 for OS and 0.633 for RFS.

conclusionsPreoperative PNI and APRI captured complementary host domains and, when combined, provided a simple classification associated with both OS and RFS after curative hepatectomy for HCC. Pending external validation, this routine laboratory-based approach may serve as a simple adjunct to existing clinical assessment when planning perioperative optimization and postoperative follow-up.

Indexed as

Aspartate AminotransferasesCarcinoma, HepatocellularHepatectomyLiver NeoplasmsNutrition AssessmentAgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPlatelet CountPreoperative PeriodPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsAspartate AminotransferasesAspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio indexHepatectomyHepatocellular carcinomaPrognosisPrognostic nutritional index

Identifiers

PMID42185759
PMCPMC13383489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.