SynthesisMovement disorders clinical practice2026
Placebo Effect in Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLevodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) is a complication of Parkinson's disease (PD) treatment. While the placebo effect is a known component in PD clinical trials, its specific magnitude in the context of LID is not well characterized.
objectiveTo quantify the magnitude of the placebo response in LID trials and to identify potential moderators of this effect.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in patients with PD and LID. The primary outcome was the change in dyskinesia severity in the placebo arm, pooled using random-effects model.
resultsThirty one publications, comprising 1329 patients, were included. Data were stratified by reporting methodology: 16 studies provided primary LS mean change data, 11 provided simple change and the remaining studies contributing solely to subgroup analyses. The primary meta-analysis, revealed a statistically significant placebo response of moderate magnitude (pooled SMD = -0.48, p < 0.0001), with significant heterogeneity (I
conclusionThe placebo response in LID is a consistent, clinically relevant phenomenon modulated by patient demographics and trial duration. Quantifying this response is essential for design and accurate interpretation of future trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.