Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42185666›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2026

Integrated human toxicokinetics of acetamiprid using urine, blood, and feces data in physiologically-based kinetic modelling for reverse dosimetry.

N C Wieland, A Noorlander, A Zwartsen, R Greupink, M H F Graumans, H Mol, J Dias, F G M Russel, A M J Ragas, P T J Scheepers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

N C WielandDepartment of Environmental Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. nina.wieland@ru.nl.ORCID 0009-0000-7880-5931
A NoorlanderWageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
A ZwartsenNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3721 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
R GreupinkDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
M H F GraumansDepartment of Environmental Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
H MolWageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
J DiasWageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
F G M RusselDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
A M J RagasDepartment of Environmental Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
P T J ScheepersDepartment of Environmental Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 862568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acetamiprid (ACE) is a widely used neonicotinoid insecticide with known neurotoxic potential, for which the European Food Safety Authority lowered the acceptable daily intake. Current physiologically-based kinetic (PBK) models lack adequate kinetic data for ACE and its metabolite acetamiprid-N-desmethyl (ACE-DEM). The aim of this study was to generate detailed disposition data for ACE in a controlled volunteer setting to develop a robust PBK model suitable for reverse dosimetry. Four volunteers received an oral dose of ACE (90% of the acceptable daily intake, ADI) and a single dermal administration on a separate occasion. Concentration-time profiles of ACE and ACE-DEM were collected for urine, blood, and feces. A PBK model was developed using toxicokinetic parameters from the volunteer study. The model was validated using previously published human data. Sensitivity analyses identified key parameters of model performance. ACE was rapidly absorbed and extensively metabolized to ACE-DEM. ACE was undetectable in urine after 24 h, while ACE-DEM remained quantifiable for 96 h. Urinary excretion accounted for 8-24% of the dose, with < 2% in feces, indicating near to complete absorption. Dermal uptake was approximately 30%. The PBK model adequately described the relationship between external exposure, plasma concentrations, and urinary excretion. Three different reverse dosimetry methods were compared. The estimated oral doses fell within a threefold margin of the administered doses. In conclusion, a human-data-informed PBK model enables reverse dosimetry to estimate oral ACE exposure from urinary biomonitoring data.

Indexed as

InsecticidesModels, BiologicalNeonicotinoidsPyridinesAdministration, CutaneousAdministration, OralAdultFecesFemaleHumansMaleSkin AbsorptionToxicokineticsacetamipridInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsPyridinesComputational modellingNeonicotinoidsPesticide exposureRisk assessmentVolunteer

Identifiers

PMID42185666
PMCPMC13453981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.