ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2026
Do non-condylar mandibular fractures affect the temporomandibular joint? a prospective clinical and radiologic follow-up study.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNon-condylar mandibular fractures may alter temporomandibular joint (TMJ) biomechanics despite the absence of direct condylar injury. This prospective study evaluated clinical and radiological TMJ changes following surgical management of non-condylar mandibular fractures.
methodsForty patients with parasymphysis, body, or angle fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation were evaluated at postoperative day 15-16 and at 6 months. Temporomandibular dysfunction was assessed using the Helkimo Anamnestic Index (Ai) and Clinical Dysfunction Index (Di). Bilateral computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (USG) were used to assess joint space and structural changes.
resultsAt 6 months, 28 patients (70%) were free of subjective symptoms, whereas 32 patients (80%) demonstrated objective clinical dysfunction (Di ≥ I). Eight patients (20%) reported severe subjective symptoms, and 4 (10%) exhibited severe objective dysfunction. CT and USG showed no significant changes in joint space and no condylar erosions or osteophytes.
conclusionTemporomandibular dysfunction is common after surgical treatment of non-condylar mandibular fractures and may persist despite resolution of symptoms and absence of detectable osseous changes. Routine TMJ assessment during postoperative follow-up may help identify patients who require continued monitoring and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42185664What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.