SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Clinical utility of liquid biopsy in distinguishing true progression from radiation necrosis and pseudoprogression in malignant brain tumor.
Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDistinguishing true tumor progression from pseudoprogression (PsP) and radiation necrosis (RN) following radiotherapy or radiosurgery for intracranial tumors remains a significant clinical challenge. Conventional imaging modalities, including MRI and PET, often lack sufficient diagnostic accuracy, while histopathological confirmation, although definitive, is invasive and not always feasible. Liquid biopsy (LB) has emerged as a promising noninvasive diagnostic approach.
methodsA systematic review was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. A total of 964 records were identified, including PubMed (n = 322), Embase (n = 280), Scopus (n = 297), and Cochrane (n = 65), along with three clinical trials identified from trial registers. After removal of 157 duplicates using Covidence, 807 studies were screened by title and abstract. Of these, 749 were excluded, and 58 articles underwent full-text review. Ultimately, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis.
resultsA diverse range of LB-based biomarkers has been investigated, including immune cell-based markers (e.g., HLA-DR
conclusionsLB-based biomarkers show promise for differentiating RN and PsP from tumor recurrence; however, current evidence is limited by small sample sizes, methodological heterogeneity, and lack of standardized diagnostic criteria. Larger prospective studies and validation of composite biomarker models are required to establish their clinical utility. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not Applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42185659What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.