ArticleIrish journal of medical science2026
Immediate effects of joint- versus soft-tissue-oriented manual therapy on lower-limb function and muscle mechanics in individuals with flexible pes planus: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFlexible pes planus (FPP) is associated with altered foot biomechanics, reduced ankle dorsiflexion, and impaired neuromuscular function, which may affect balance and performance. Manual therapy targeting joint and soft tissue structures is commonly used; however, the comparative immediate effects of these approaches remain unclear.
aimsTo compare the immediate effects of joint-oriented manual therapy (J-MT) and soft-tissue-oriented manual therapy (ST-MT) on dorsiflexion range of motion (DFROM), foot morphology, dynamic balance, and muscle mechanical properties in physically active adults with FPP.
methodsIn this prospective randomized controlled trial, 45 adults (18-35 years) with FPP were allocated to J-MT (n = 15), ST-MT (n = 15), or control (n = 15) using concealed block randomization. J-MT involved ankle-foot joint mobilization, while ST-MT targeted the triceps surae, Achilles tendon, and plantar fascia. Controls received no intervention. The primary outcome was DFROM (weight-bearing lunge test). Secondary outcomes included navicular drop (ND), Foot Posture Index (FPI), Y-Balance Test, and myotonometric muscle properties. Assessments were performed pre- and post-intervention.
resultsBoth J-MT and ST-MT significantly reduced ND and FPI versus controls (p < 0.05), with no between-group difference. J-MT improved DFROM and anterior reach more than ST-MT (p < 0.05). No significant differences in dynamic balance were observed. ST-MT reduced soleus tone and tibialis anterior stiffness, while both interventions improved soleus elasticity (p < 0.05). No adverse events occurred.
conclusionsJ-MT and ST-MT produce immediate, parameter-specific effects in FPP. J-MT enhances dorsiflexion, whereas ST-MT better modulates muscle mechanical properties, supporting the selection of targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42185633What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.