Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42185631›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2026

Improved patient models for simulation of clinically realistic

Johan Gustafsson, Philip Kalaitzidis, Selma Curkic Kapidzic, Michael Ljungberg, Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johan GustafssonMedical Radiation Physics, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. johan_ruben.gustafsson@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1022-8370
Philip KalaitzidisMedical Radiation Physics, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4930-5548
Selma Curkic KapidzicMedical Radiation Physics, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0329-5656
Michael LjungbergMedical Radiation Physics, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8202-5724
Katarina Sjögreen GleisnerMedical Radiation Physics, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5664-8760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim was to improve the realism of patient models for Monte-Carlo based evaluation of image-based quantification of tumour volume and activity in [

methodsThree phantoms from the XCAT population were used as basis. Tumour structures were obtained from segmentation of patient

resultsThe full models were successfully realized and were found to yield a visual appearance that more closely resembled that of patients, compared to the full-without-motion and standard models. For tumours in the volume range 0 mL to 10 mL, the mean relative errors obtained for

conclusionsRespiratory motion is an important factor for modelling realistic patient images, in the context of quantitative SPECT and PET. Non-spherical tumours and background variability has a minor, but measurable impact.

Indexed as

activity quantificationAnthropomorphic phantomsMonte Carlo simulationsPETSIMIND Monte CarloSPECT

Identifiers

PMID42185631
PMCPMC13222913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.