Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42185584›Full record

ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2026

Extreme Experience Reconsidered: Existential, Developmental, and Embodied Dimensions.

Shogo Tanaka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shogo TanakaTokai University, Shibuya, Japan. shg.tanaka@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper offers a theoretical re-situating of extreme experiences in response to Dominik Mihalits' (2025) multidimensional model. While acknowledging the value of Mihalits' effort to de-pathologize extreme experiences, it is argued that many of the phenomena he seeks to conceptualize have long been addressed within earlier traditions of psychological and existential thought. Drawing on Karl Jaspers' analysis of boundary situations and Abraham Maslow's theory of peak and plateau experiences, the paper reconstructs the existential and developmental significance of extreme experiences beyond their descriptive classification. It is proposed that such experiences are not merely defined by intensity but involve disruptions of ordinary selfhood and openings toward value-laden modes of perception. Building on this reinterpretation, the paper introduces an embodied perspective to clarify how these transformations are lived. By focusing on the dynamics of the lived body and body schema, extreme experiences are conceptualized as embodied threshold phenomena in which habitual patterns of perception, action, and agency are temporarily suspended and reorganized. From this perspective, Mihalits' six dimensions can be understood as descriptive markers of deeper existential, developmental, and embodied processes rather than as a wholly novel framework. The paper concludes that extreme experiences should be approached not as marginal anomalies but as moments in which the fundamental structure of human existence becomes particularly visible.

Indexed as

ExistentialismHuman DevelopmentModels, PsychologicalPsychological TheoryHumansBody schemaBoundary situationsEmbodimentExtreme experiencePeak experiencePsychological transformation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.