ArticleNature neuroscience2026
Fixation duration on natural scenes is explained by memory encoding not processing demand.
Article in Nature neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fixation duration on natural scenes is explained by memory encoding not processing demand.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Before each of around 200,000 eye movements we make each day, the brain decides how long to fixate before shifting gaze to new information. Here we investigate this process using a large-scale scene-viewing experiment (4,080 natural scenes, five participants) that combines magnetoencephalography, eye tracking and a semantic captioning task. Using multivariate analysis of magnetoencephalography source-space patterns, behavioral analyses and artificial neural network (ANN) modeling, we show that longer fixations do not reflect prolonged visual processing but relate to downstream memory encoding. First, temporal variability of ventral stream representational dynamics did not explain variability in fixation duration. Second, fixation durations were anticorrelated with ANN-estimated patch classification difficulty. Third, fixation durations correlate positively with ANN-predicted patch memorability and caption-inclusion and co-occur with increased theta-gamma phase-amplitude coupling, particularly in frontal and hippocampal regions. These results indicate that eye-movement timing decisions are shaped by memory-encoding demands rather than by perceptual processing limits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.