ArticleScientific reports2026
Assessment of community pharmacists' knowledge on rivaroxaban drug and food interactions in Sudan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess community pharmacists knowledge of Rivaroxaban drug and food interactions in Sudan addressing gaps in understanding crucial for patient safety. The use of rivaroxaban is increasing globally, ensuring pharmacists are equipped to manage its administration and interactions are vital, particularly in settings with limited prior exposure to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This is the first study to assess DOAC knowledge among community pharmacists in Sudan, a low-resource context with unique pharmacy practice challenges. A survey with 15 questions was conducted among 420 community pharmacists in Sudan. The questionnaire evaluated knowledge of administration requirements, herbal and drug interactions, dispensing practices, patient education strategies, and self-reported confidence levels. Key measures included correct identification of dosage-specific administration guidelines, awareness of herbal and drug interactions, patient education practices, and confidence levels in handling Rivaroxaban. Pharmacists demonstrated strong knowledge of administration for higher doses (95.2% for food requirements of 15 mg/20 mg), but confusion persisted regarding lower doses (58.5% correct for 10 mg). Awareness of herbal interactions was high (91.2%), yet 45.6% never checked drug-drug interactions and 28.9% rarely did so (74.5% never or rarely). Patient education practices were inconsistent, with only 20.9% providing written materials and 10.7% offering no counseling. Confidence levels were moderate (56.3%), highlighting gaps between knowledge and practical application. Multivariate analysis identified prior DOAC training (AOR = 3.40; 95% CI 2.10-5.52; p < 0.001), more than 10 years of experience (AOR = 2.15; 95% CI 1.42-3.25; p < 0.001), and postgraduate education (AOR = 1.85; 95% CI 1.10-3.12; p = 0.018) as significant predictors of adequate knowledge. While pharmacists exhibited solid knowledge of some aspects, significant gaps remain in dosage-specific guidelines, drug interaction monitoring, and patient education. These shortcomings pose risks to patient safety and underscore the need for targeted training programs to enhance practical application skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.