SynthesisScientific reports2026
Prevalence of poor self-care practice and associated factors among adult asthmatic patients in Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Self-compassion, self-care, and rhinitis control assessment in patients with allergic rhinitis: a latent profile and mediation analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poor self-care practice among adult asthmatic patients is a prevalent and serious clinical concern, as it is directly associated with significantly greater morbidity and mortality. It leads to adverse outcomes, including more frequent exacerbations, increased utilization of rescue inhalers and oral steroids, higher rates of emergency department visits, quantifiable reductions in lung function, and an overall decline in quality of life. Although several primary studies in Africa have reported highly variable prevalence rates of poor self-care practice among adult populations, no study has yet synthesized these findings. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to estimate the pooled prevalence of poor self-care practice among adult asthmatics in Africa and to identify the key associated factors. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 guidelines. Studies conducted among adult asthmatic patients in Africa that reported asthma self-care practice levels and/or associated factors were included, while interventional studies, reviews, articles without full-text availability, or those of low methodological quality were excluded. Data were retrieved from Web of Science, CINHAL, PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and University repositories. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects model was applied to estimate the pooled prevalence of poor self-care practice. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test and funnel plots, and sensitivity analysis examined the impact of individual studies on the pooled estimate. Data were extracted in Microsoft Excel, and analyses were conducted in STATA 17, with significance set at p < 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval. A total of eight studies with 1779 adult asthmatics were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of poor self-care practice was 55.47% (95% CI = 46.10, 64.84) with 95% prediction interval (26.38%, 84.55%). Several socio-demographic, clinical, behavioral, and psychosocial factors were consistently associated with poor asthma self-care practice. Interventions to improve asthma self-care practice in Africa should adopt a holistic approach that targets high-risk groups (older adults, those with low education or comorbidities), addresses modifiable behaviors such as smoking and alcohol use, supports mental health, and strengthens social support networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.