ReviewGene therapy2026
Research progress and development strategies of antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates.
Review in Gene therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- FDA-approved antisense oligonucleotide therapies for duchenne muscular dystrophy: current status and future outlook.RNA biology · 2026Review
- Antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates: design principles, intracellular delivery, and translational opportunities.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates (AOCs) effectively integrate the delivery capability of antibodies with the specific gene regulatory function of oligonucleotides, offering a novel strategy for extrahepatic delivery. Unlike antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), AOCs employ nucleic acid payloads, enabling specific gene modulation with reduced off-target effects, thus providing new avenues for treating genetic disorders. While AOC candidates for conditions such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) have progressed to Phase III trials, their development remains constrained by limited targets like TfR1, and their activity is highly dependent on antibody selection, linker design, and modification strategies. This study delves into the fundamental principles of target selection and antibody engineering, emphasizing that the endocytic efficiency of the target receptor is a critical factor for the successful delivery of AOC therapeutics. Taking TfR1 as an example, it analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of different antibody formats, examines the structure-activity relationships between linker chemistry and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and further explores nucleic acid modification strategies aimed at enhancing delivery efficiency. Finally, the study outlines future directions for AOC development, including advances in bispecific antibodies, peptide conjugation, gene editing, and artificial intelligence-driven approaches, aiming to provide forward-looking perspectives and a theoretical foundation for the design of AOC therapeutics.
Identifiers
42185455What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.