ArticleScientific reports2026
A self-supervised GNN-Transformer framework for weak microseismic signal identification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Weak microseismic signals generated during hydraulic fracturing contain critical information on fracture initiation and propagation, serving as a key basis for evaluating fracturing effectiveness and ensuring mining safety. However, in deep coal mining environments, strong mechanical disturbances, electromagnetic interference, and complex non-stationary noise lead to low signal-to-noise ratios and weak signal energy, posing significant challenges to traditional identification methods. To address these issues, a self-supervised GNN-Transformer framework (SS-GNN-MSTF-Transformer) is proposed for robust weak microseismic signal recognition. First, a multi-scale spatiotemporal feature extraction module (MSTF) is developed by integrating Short-Time Fourier Transform (STFT) with multi-scale convolution, enabling joint modeling of global and local time-frequency characteristics. Then, a Transformer encoder incorporating Rotary Position Encoding (RoPE) and multi-scale attention is employed to capture both long- and short-range temporal dependencies. Meanwhile, an adaptive graph neural network (GNN) is introduced to learn spatial correlations among monitoring stations in a data-driven manner, facilitating effective multi-station information fusion. Furthermore, a self-supervised learning strategy combining contrastive learning, masked time-frequency prediction, and graph structure recovery is designed to enhance feature representation under limited labeled data conditions. Experimental results based on real microseismic monitoring datasets demonstrate that the proposed method achieves an average accuracy and F1-score of 0.9343 under five-fold cross-validation, outperforming conventional methods such as SVM, KNN, RF, and BPNN. In addition, engineering validation on two independent field datasets shows that the model achieves F1-scores of 0.9341 and 0.9216, respectively, with improvements of 7.17% and 6.79% compared with the best traditional method (RF), confirming its strong generalization ability under different geological conditions and noise environments. The model also maintains an inference latency of approximately 14.9 ms per sample, demonstrating its feasibility for real-time monitoring applications. Overall, the proposed framework significantly improves the accuracy, robustness, and generalization ability of weak microseismic signal identification, providing a reliable and efficient solution for hydraulic fracturing monitoring, fracture propagation analysis, and safety assessment in deep mining environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.