Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42185426›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A self-supervised GNN-Transformer framework for weak microseismic signal identification.

Mingwei Liu, Zhigang Deng, Yunpeng Li, Zhijia Zhang, Tianyu Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mingwei LiuSchool of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, China.
Zhigang DengChina Coal Research Institute, Beijing, 100013, China. 18601241802@163.com.
Yunpeng LiChina Coal Research Institute, Beijing, 100013, China.
Zhijia ZhangCollege of Mining, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, 123000, China.
Tianyu FuSchool of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (Youth Program) 52404215Tiandi Technology Innovation and Entrepreneurship Fund 2024-TD-ZD010-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weak microseismic signals generated during hydraulic fracturing contain critical information on fracture initiation and propagation, serving as a key basis for evaluating fracturing effectiveness and ensuring mining safety. However, in deep coal mining environments, strong mechanical disturbances, electromagnetic interference, and complex non-stationary noise lead to low signal-to-noise ratios and weak signal energy, posing significant challenges to traditional identification methods. To address these issues, a self-supervised GNN-Transformer framework (SS-GNN-MSTF-Transformer) is proposed for robust weak microseismic signal recognition. First, a multi-scale spatiotemporal feature extraction module (MSTF) is developed by integrating Short-Time Fourier Transform (STFT) with multi-scale convolution, enabling joint modeling of global and local time-frequency characteristics. Then, a Transformer encoder incorporating Rotary Position Encoding (RoPE) and multi-scale attention is employed to capture both long- and short-range temporal dependencies. Meanwhile, an adaptive graph neural network (GNN) is introduced to learn spatial correlations among monitoring stations in a data-driven manner, facilitating effective multi-station information fusion. Furthermore, a self-supervised learning strategy combining contrastive learning, masked time-frequency prediction, and graph structure recovery is designed to enhance feature representation under limited labeled data conditions. Experimental results based on real microseismic monitoring datasets demonstrate that the proposed method achieves an average accuracy and F1-score of 0.9343 under five-fold cross-validation, outperforming conventional methods such as SVM, KNN, RF, and BPNN. In addition, engineering validation on two independent field datasets shows that the model achieves F1-scores of 0.9341 and 0.9216, respectively, with improvements of 7.17% and 6.79% compared with the best traditional method (RF), confirming its strong generalization ability under different geological conditions and noise environments. The model also maintains an inference latency of approximately 14.9 ms per sample, demonstrating its feasibility for real-time monitoring applications. Overall, the proposed framework significantly improves the accuracy, robustness, and generalization ability of weak microseismic signal identification, providing a reliable and efficient solution for hydraulic fracturing monitoring, fracture propagation analysis, and safety assessment in deep mining environments.

Indexed as

Intelligent recognitionRock formation hydraulic fracturingSS-GNN-MSTF-TransformerWeak microseismic signals

Identifiers

PMID42185426
PMCPMC13434773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.