ArticleScientific reports2026
Athletes' performance and injury management in sports training using association rules and data mining techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimizing athletic performance while minimizing injury risk remains a central challenge in sports science. Although large volumes of athlete monitoring data are now available, existing studies primarily rely on modeling or isolated statistical analyses, with limited exploration of interpretable pattern discovery for understanding multi-factor relationships. This study addresses this gap by applying association rule mining techniques, including Apriori, FP-Growth, and Eclat, to identify conditional relationships within a comprehensive sports training dataset comprising demographic, physiological, psychological, and training-related variables. Unlike prior work focused mainly on classification accuracy, this approach emphasizes interpretable rule extraction to identify key combinations of training intensity, recovery status, sleep, and prior injury history associated with performance and injury outcomes. Rule quality is evaluated using standard association measures, while validation is conducted through classification-based metrics. The results show that association rule mining can reveal stable and high-impact patterns that may inform monitoring interpretation, support hypothesis generation, and help prioritize factors for future prospective validation. This study highlights the value of interpretable data mining frameworks for exploring association structures in sports training data within a non-causal analytical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.