Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42185412›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

External validity of deep learning solution for spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage detection on head CT scans.

Juuso Takala, Olivier Zanier, Valérie Blom, Vincens Kälin, Lara Maria Höbner, Chantal Marie Klesel, Isabel C Hostettler, Victor E Staartjes, Miikka Korja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Juuso TakalaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, P.O. Box 266, FI-00029. juuso.takala@helsinki.fi.
Olivier ZanierMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Valérie BlomMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Vincens KälinDepartment of Neurosurgery, HOCH Health Ostschweiz, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Lara Maria HöbnerMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Chantal Marie KleselDepartment of Neurosurgery, HOCH Health Ostschweiz, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Isabel C HostettlerDepartment of Neurosurgery, HOCH Health Ostschweiz, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Victor E StaartjesMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Miikka KorjaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, P.O. Box 266, FI-00029.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We externally validated the performance of deep learning (DL) solution for detection of spontaneous intracerebral (ICH), intraventricular (IVH) and subarachnoid hemorrhages (SAH) on non-contrast enhanced head CT scans (NCCTs). We analyzed 901 NCCTs collected retrospectively from two Swiss hospitals: University Hospital Zürich (USZ) and HOCH Health Ostschweiz, Kantonsspital St. Gallen (KSSG). Of these 901 NCCTs, 81 had spontaneous ICH, IVH or SAH. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using the radiologist's reports as the reference standard. The DL solution correctly identified 74 out of the 81 intracranial hemorrhages (sensitivity 91.4%). In the USZ cohort, the sensitivity was 88.5% and the specificity was 89.7%. Using the original KSSG-NCCTs, the DL solution had a sensitivity of 100.0% and a specificity of 47.5%. After adjusting the KSSG-NCCTs pixel matrix to a standardized 512 × 512 resolution the KSSG cohort sensitivity remained at 100.0%, and the specificity increased to 74.0%. The overall specificity was 78.4% when using the original imaging data. The overall specificity increased to 85.5% when using the padded KSSG-NCCTs along with original imaging data from USZ. Particularly the specificity varied substantially depending on imaging acquisition parameters. In a clinical setting, this would mean a high variability in a false positive rate.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHeadIntracranial HemorrhagesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySubarachnoid HemorrhageConvolutional neural networksDeep learningDiagnostic accuracyExternal validationHead CT scanIntracranial hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID42185412
PMCPMC13434149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.