ArticleScientific reports2026
gKFA: a geometric framework for kurtosis fractional anisotropy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) extends diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) by incorporating non-Gaussian diffusion effects through a fourth-order kurtosis tensor. In this work, we investigate the three-dimensional geometric structure of the kurtosis tensor and introduce a geometry-inspired anisotropy descriptor based on mapped symmetric second-order quadratic forms. This representation enables kurtosis anisotropy to be studied through lower-order tensors whose geometry is easier to analyze and whose positive definiteness can be assessed more conveniently. Based on this framework, we define geometric kurtosis fractional anisotropy (gKFA) as the geometric mean of the fractional anisotropies computed from the mapped quadratic forms. The proposed descriptor was evaluated using simulations, physical phantoms, and in vivo human and rodent brain data. In simulations and phantom experiments, gKFA showed sensitivity to directional heterogeneity and tissue-complexity changes that were only weakly reflected by conventional KFA. In the human brain dataset, additional analyses compared gKFA with conventional kurtosis fractional anisotropy (KFA), mean kurtosis (MK), axial kurtosis (AK), radial kurtosis (RK), and anisotropy measures derived from the mapped quadratic forms. These results indicate that gKFA behaves as a kurtosis-anisotropy descriptor that is closely related, but not identical, to KFA, and distinct from standard scalar kurtosis measures such as MK, AK, and RK. In both human and rodent data, gKFA showed better tissue contrast and complementary behavior relative to KFA, including sensitivity to regional differences in the rodent brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.