ArticleScientific reports2026
Large-sample PCA eigenvectors stabilize cortical thickness components and improve small sample brain behavior prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reproducible brain-wide association studies remain challenging in structural MRI, in part because high-dimensional cortical measures yield unstable eigenspaces in small samples. Here, using cortical thickness data from the Human Connectome Project Young Adult cohort (N = 1,113), we examined how sample size influences the stability of principal component analysis (PCA) and whether eigenvectors derived from larger samples can improve brain-behavior prediction in independent small samples. PCA stability was quantified across overlapping and non-overlapping resampling schemes using cosine similarity and one-to-one Hungarian matching of components. PCA stability increased systematically with sample size: Subsamples under 100 participants yielded few stable components, whereas larger subsamples produced dozens. Thus, reproducibility hinges not only on statistical power but on the stability of the representational basis: components learned in small subsamples are fragile, while eigenvectors from larger samples converge to stable, transferable axes. We then compared three prediction settings (500 vs. 500, 500 vs. 100, and 100 vs. 100) across 65 cognitive and personality traits using linear regression and machine-learning models. Transferring eigenvectors derived from larger samples to another smaller samples consistently improved prediction relative to deriving PCA components within the same small sample, although absolute effect sizes remained modest. Prediction performance was highest at an intermediate dimensionality of approximately 30 principal components, indicating that increasing the number of retained components does not necessarily improve generalization. These findings identify PCA eigenspace stability as a key determinant of reproducible brain-behavior inference and suggest that reusing larger-sample PCA eigenvectors is a practical strategy for stabilizing feature extraction in resource-limited neuroimaging studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.