ArticleScientific reports2026
Data-driven prediction of micro-piled raft load-settlement using machine learning and Monte Carlo simulation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the load-settlement behavior of micro-piled raft foundations in clay, focusing on key factors such as raft and micro-pile geometry and critical soil properties. A comprehensive dataset comprising 480 experimental records. sourced from both small-scale laboratory and large-scale field tests. was used to evaluate the predictive capabilities of six supervised machine learning algorithms: Gaussian process regression (GPR), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), gradient boosting machine (GBM), random forest (RF), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and support vector regression (SVR). Each model was optimized using Bayesian optimization with 5-fold cross-validation to ensure robust performance. Model evaluation was conducted using statistical metrics, visual diagnostics (predicted-versus-actual plots), Regression error characteristics curves, score analysis, and hyperparameter tuning. Among the tested models, GPR demonstrated superior accuracy and generalization, effectively capturing the nonlinear soil-structure interaction typical of micro-piled raft foundations. Probabilistic analysis using Monte Carlo simulations, incorporating realistic variability in geometric and geotechnical input parameters, further validated the model's robustness. The close agreement between predicted and experimental load-settlement responses, along with consistently narrow 95% confidence intervals, confirms the reliability of GPR. These findings position GPR as a highly promising approach for practical geotechnical design applications. Future research should focus on expanding dataset diversity, improving parameter independence, and applying advanced tuning techniques to further enhance model reliability and applicability to full-scale foundation systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.