ArticleScientific reports2026
Interpretable and extrapolation-stable model for predicting nanofluid thermal conductivity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of nanofluid thermal conductivity is essential for the design of advanced thermal systems; however, existing approaches often face a trade-off between predictive accuracy and physical interpretability. In this study, a physics-guided hybrid modeling framework is proposed by integrating a Generalized Additive Model (GAM) with a Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) to address this limitation. The proposed methodology combines a spline-based GAM to capture global thermophysical trends with a regularized boosting model to learn localized nonlinear corrections. A comprehensive preprocessing pipeline is implemented, including feature engineering, Box-Cox transformation for variance stabilization, and a Random Forest-based outlier detection strategy. The hybrid model is evaluated against several state-of-the-art machine learning methods, including Random Forest, Support Vector Regression, Gaussian Processes, Neural Networks, and Decision Trees. The results demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves high predictive accuracy (RMSE [Formula: see text] W/mK) while maintaining physically consistent behavior across the studied domain. The model's generalization capability is further validated using a Leave-One-Group-Out (LOGO) protocol, where it exhibits stable performance when predicting unseen base fluids. Additionally, the hybrid approach produces smooth and interpretable response profiles that align with known thermodynamic trends. These findings indicate that physics-guided hybrid modeling provides a balanced and reliable approach for thermophysical property prediction, offering improved interpretability without compromising predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.