Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42185393›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A Multi-Strategy Adaptive Hybrid Optimization Algorithm for Benchmark Functions and Engineering Design Problems.

M Paknahad, P Hosseini, C Paknahad, S J S Hakim, A H Gandomi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M PaknahadFaculty of Engineering, Mahallat Institute of Higher Education, Mahallat, Iran.
P HosseiniFaculty of Engineering, Mahallat Institute of Higher Education, Mahallat, Iran.
C PaknahadDepartment of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, School of Computing and Engineering, University of West London, London, W5 5RF, UK.
S J S HakimDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, University Tun Hussein onn Malaysia (UTHM), Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia.
A H GandomiUniversity Research and Innovation Center (EKIK), Óbuda University, Budapest, 1034, Hungary. gandomi@uts.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engineering optimization problems are increasingly complex, requiring more sophisticated approaches to locate global optima. This paper presents the Adaptive Hybrid Optimization (AHO) algorithm, which addresses the limitations of single-equation update mechanisms and conventional linear decay schedules through three structural contributions. First, the algorithm implements four distinct position-update strategies, selected uniformly at random at each agent update, ensuring continuous structural diversity throughout the optimization process. Second, a dual-leader probabilistic guidance mechanism directs each search agent using asymmetric weighting between the top two solutions. Third, a nonlinear power-changing control parameter D replaces the conventional linear decay schedule used in existing algorithms such as WOA and GWO, providing 43% more total exploration budget while maintaining faster late-phase exploitation. AHO is validated on 23 benchmark functions from the CEC2005 suite and on seven constrained engineering problems, including four space truss structures: the 10-bar Truss Design, the 25-bar Spatial Truss, the 72-bar Spatial Truss, and the 120-bar Dome Truss. Friedman ranking analysis across all 23 benchmark functions ranked AHO first among the eight algorithms tested, with an overall best rank of 1.78 and an overall mean rank of 1.84. Wilcoxon signed-rank test results confirm statistically significant improvement over five of seven competitor algorithms on more than 19 of 23 benchmark functions, with AHO achieving the best overall Friedman rank of 1.78 across all 23 functions. On the four truss optimization problems, AHO achieves the best ranking across all five performance metrics against all seven competitor algorithms under an equal budget of 50,000 structural function evaluations per run. Performance analysis demonstrates competitive convergence behaviour and solution quality compared with the selected benchmark methods.

Indexed as

Adaptive hybrid optimizationEngineering optimizationMetaheuristic algorithmNumerical simulationOptimization techniques

Identifiers

PMID42185393
PMCPMC13434657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.