ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhancing photovoltaic efficiency in arid climates using cooling strategies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study experimentally investigates the performance enhancement of photovoltaic (PV) panels using different cooling techniques under real outdoor operating conditions. Three cooling approaches are evaluated, including water-spray cooling, serpentine water circulation, and a fame-glass configuration. The objective is to assess their impact on PV surface temperature and electrical performance. Experimental measurements are conducted under similar environmental conditions, and the current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of the PV modules were recorded for each cooling configuration. The results demonstrate that active cooling techniques significantly reduced the operating temperature of the PV module, which consequently improved its electrical performance. Among the tested methods, the water-spray cooling technique achieved the most effective temperature reduction and the highest improvement in power output. In contrast, the fame-glass configuration showed a reduction in electrical power despite lowering the panel temperature, mainly due to optical losses and partial shading caused by the glass frame structure. The findings highlight the importance of selecting appropriate cooling strategies that balance thermal management and optical performance. Overall, the results confirm that effective cooling techniques can enhance PV efficiency and contribute to improved energy production in hot climate regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.