ArticleNature communications2026
Large-scale investigation for antimicrobial activity reveals newly-identified defensive species across the healthy skin microbiome.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-genome analysis of Brevibacterium sanguinis AZMABM HM27: a bacterial isolate from the sea anemone Radianthus magnifica and exhibiting promising multi-therapeutic properties.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- vClassifier: a toolkit for high-resolution phylogenetic classification of prokaryotic viruses.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The skin microbiome forms a protective barrier to pathogens, including through the production of antimicrobial metabolites. Here, we present EPIC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.