ArticleNature communications2026
Benchmarking genome choice in functional genomics analyses.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- HPRC2: A human pangenome reference with near-complete coverage of common genetic variation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The human genome reference established a shared coordinate system for genome function, but it is incomplete and not fully representative of human diversity. Here, we benchmark how genome representation and corresponding analytical frameworks for each representation shape functional genomics using chromatin accessibility sequencing (ATAC-seq), RNA sequencing, whole-genome bisulfite sequencing, and chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) data from lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from five individuals with fully phased genome assemblies. We compare results across hg38, CHM13, the draft human pangenome, and each individual's maternal and paternal assemblies. Because current pipelines and quality control conventions are tuned to hg38, several of these comparisons reflect genome representation in the context of available methods, rather than sequence alone. Individual identity accounts for 57.52-78.47% of total variance in functional estimates, whereas genome choice contributes 0.002-7.85% and sample-by-genome interactions contribute 0.63-5.43%. About 2% of biological signals are detectable only with personal assemblies. Although these effects are modest overall, some biologically important features remain inaccessible to linear references. Consistent with this, graph-based DNA methylation analysis in the human pangenome reveals a non-reference AluY5a insertion within a putative TNKS enhancer at chromosome 8p23.1 that becomes visible and hypermethylated only in the pangenome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.