ArticleNature communications2026
Comparative analysis of the cellular landscape in mammalian striatum.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fine-mapping candidate neuropsychiatric regulatory variants using cell type-aware comparative genomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Challenges in predicting chromatin accessibility differences between species.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of the cellular landscape in mammalian striatum.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Morphoelectric Diversity and Specialization of Neuronal Cell Types in the Primate Striatum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Challenges in Predicting Chromatin Accessibility Differences between Species.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The dorsal striatum is important for highly specialized functions including movement, learning, and habit formation. However, it is not known if species-specialized behaviors are associated with cellular specializations in the striatum. Here, we compared single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) data from human, chimpanzee, rhesus macaque, common marmoset, and pale spear-nosed bat caudate (CN) and putamen (Pu) separately as well as mouse caudoputamen (C-Pu), which represents divergence among species spanning approximately 94 million years of evolution. We observed a lower neuron-to-glia ratio in primate striata compared to non-primates, reflecting the allometric scaling of neuron density and relative glia density invariance in larger brains. Among neurons, eccentric spiny projection neurons (eSPNs) - an SPN of unknown function - showed significantly lower proportions in non-primate striata for both CN and Pu. Focusing on the heterogeneity within interneurons, we identified two bat striatal interneuron cell types that are nearly absent in other species: which express LMO3, and co-express FOXP2 and TSHZ2. Other striatal interneurons also exhibited differential abundance between primates and non-primates. In summary, we provide a comprehensive snRNA-seq dataset of dorsal striatum, identify two distinct, previously uncharacterized populations of bat interneurons, and uncover fundamental cellular composition differences between primate and non-primate striata.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.