ArticleNeuropsychologia2026
Impacted and preserved sub-domains of cognitive control in schizophrenia.
Article in Neuropsychologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive control refers to the ability to dynamically guide behavior by maintaining goal context and filtering out irrelevant information. Cognitive control deficits are well-documented in people with schizophrenia (PSZ), but the degree of impairment varies considerably depending upon the type of control being assessed. The present study examined three domains of cognitive control-selective attention to context, rule switching, and response conflict management-within a single paradigm to characterize different facets of cognitive control dysfunction in PSZ. Thirty-eight PSZ and 35 healthy control subjects (HCS) completed a cued task-switching paradigm that required participants to make a button-press response to different features of a target stimulus (letter, number, or color) depending upon the location that the target appeared on each trial. Prior to target onset, participants were presented with a cue indicating which stimulus dimension would be probed. PSZ were able to utilize the cue as effectively as HCS; however, when the relevant target dimension switched between trials (thus requiring a different stimulus-response mapping), PSZ showed greater switch costs compared to HCS. Finally, PSZ showed modestly impaired response conflict management when the irrelevant stimulus dimensions of the target corresponded to a different (incongruent) response compared to the relevant stimulus dimension. These findings suggest that selective attention to context is mostly intact, but response rule switching and response conflict management are impaired in PSZ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.