Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42184600›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2026

Physical genomics: Why gene regulation is tug of war between polymer physics and biochemistry.

Sarah Harris, Agnes Noy, Wilma K Olson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah HarrisSchool of Mathematical and Physics Sciences, University of Sheffield, UK. Electronic address: sarah.harris@sheffield.ac.uk.
Agnes NoySchool of Physics, Engineering and Technology, University of York, York, UK; York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, York, UK.
Wilma K OlsonDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Center for Quantitative Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

THEORETICFAL ASPECTS OF DNA SUPERCOILINGR01GM034809 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI OLSON, WILMA K · 1985 to 2019
$4.6M
X3DNA-DSSR: a resource for structural bioinformatics of nucleic acidsR24GM153869 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Xiang-Jun Lu · 2024 to 2026
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM034809NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM153869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA-protein interactions underlie genome activity, governing gene expression as well as the physical organisation of DNA. Until recently, DNA-protein complexes were predominantly described at atomic resolution using short DNA fragments, concealing how proteins recognise and manipulate the long, supercoiled DNA present in cells. Now single-molecule imaging and cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) are showing how longer DNA sequences are recognised by proteins and computations are predicting how these elements influence larger-scale genomic structures. Here we discuss how the polymeric nature of DNA influences its atomic-level structure and dynamics, as well as the implications for DNA recognition and ultimately biological function. We emphasise how theory and simulation help interpret these effects, which are difficult to replicate using conventional experimental settings.

Indexed as

DNAGene Expression RegulationGenomicsPolymersModels, MolecularNucleic Acid ConformationDNAPolymers

Identifiers

PMID42184600
PMCPMC13334559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.