Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42184373›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2026

Peer-Mentored Social Media Groups for Youth Vaping Cessation: Single-Arm Pilot Trial.

Joanne Chen Lyu, Justin S White, Kaira Shlipak, Aliyyat Afolabi, Pamela M Ling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joanne Chen LyuTSET Health Promotion and Research Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, 655 Research Parkway Suite 400, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, United States, 1 405 271 6872.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4178-6746
Justin S WhiteDepartment of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3388-9569
Kaira ShlipakCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5548-5905
Aliyyat AfolabiCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9257-8242
Pamela M LingCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6166-9347

Funding

Developing a peer mentoring system for social media adolescent vaping cessation interventions: A feasibility and acceptability study.F32CA265059 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LYU, CHEN JOANNE · 2021 to 2021
$81k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA265059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Using social media to deliver e-cigarette cessation interventions to young people is a promising approach, but low participant engagement and retention may undermine intervention efficacy. Peer mentoring holds great potential to address these issues. Objective: This study aimed to understand the feasibility and acceptability of integrating peer mentoring into a social media-based intervention to help young people quit e-cigarette use. Methods: We conducted a single-arm pilot trial with 24 e-cigarette users (aged 16-21 years). Participants were assigned to 1 of 2 Instagram groups, where they received an existing vaping cessation intervention, Quit the Hit (QTH), in which a trained counselor posted 1 to 3 evidence-based vaping cessation messages on weekdays over 5 weeks. As an adjunct to QTH, each group included 2 peer mentors of similar age as participants who had successfully quit vaping. The mentors provided social support and shared their quitting experiences. Participants completed a baseline survey and a follow-up survey at the end of the intervention (week 5) and were invited to participate in postintervention focus groups. Results: Participants' mean age was 18.6 (SD 1.2) years, and 58.3% (14/24) were male. Most (20/24, 83.3%) identified as straight/heterosexual, 29.2% (7/24) identified as non-Hispanic White, and 45.8% (11/24) were high school students. On average, participants vaped e-cigarettes 5.1 (SD 1.7) days per week, and 33.3% (8/24) reported daily vaping. All participants (24/24, 100%) had made at least one quit attempt in the past year. Nearly all participants (23/24, 95.8%) engaged in the group by either posting or liking others' comments at least once. Mean program engagement was 28.8 (SD 27.3) posts or likes over the 5 weeks. The study retention rate was 91.7% (22/24) at week 5. Using an intent-to-treat approach, 66.7% (16/24) of participants were abstinent (7-day point prevalence abstinence) at week 5. On a 5-point Likert scale, participants rated peer mentoring as highly useful (mean 4.6, SD 0.3) and reported high levels of satisfaction (mean 4.7, SD 0.3). All participants who completed the follow-up survey said they would recommend the program to others. Focus group findings supported these results, highlighting positive feedback on both the quality and usefulness of peer mentoring and the peer-mentored version of the QTH program. Suggestions for future improvements were also discussed. Conclusions: Integrating peer mentoring into social media-based e-cigarette cessation interventions for young people is feasible and acceptable. Participants engaged in the intervention and demonstrated strong retention. They rated both the peer mentoring and the overall program highly. Self-reported abstinence at 5 weeks was high. Larger trials are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of the peer-mentored intervention.

Indexed as

adolescentspeer mentoringsocial mediavaping cessation interventionyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID42184373
PMCPMC13200802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.