ReviewParasite (Paris, France)2026
Zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania major: Do humans play a role in amplifying transmission?
Review in Parasite (Paris, France), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ZCL) caused by Leishmania (L.) major is the most widespread form of CL worldwide, with hundreds of thousands of cases annually. It is associated with significant morbidity and economic burden, particularly in North Africa and the Middle East. For over a century, the zoonotic transmission of ZCL, involving wild gerbils (Muridae: Gerbillinae) as the reservoir and Phlebotomus (Ph.) papatasi as the vector, has been considered an established fact, with no contradictory debate. However, the pronounced endophilic and anthropophilic behaviors of Ph. papatasi, the exposure of multiple and large lesions, although with relatively limited persistence, to sandflies during their seasonal activity, and the simultaneous detection of human and L. major DNA within the vector, suggest a contribution of humans to the parasite cycle. Conversely, the high incidence of the disease in anthropized foci and the high prevalence of family cases highlight the role of humans in amplifying transmission. The experiments carried out by Adler and Theodor in the 1920s in Palestine and the more recent studies done by Fatemi et al. (2018) in Iran that identified L. major infectious metacyclic forms in Ph. papatasi fed on ZCL lesions reinforce this hypothesis. Additional xenodiagnoses-based approaches could provide definitive answers and lead to better management and control of ZCL, leading to a recommendation of updated preventive measures at the household level. This review aims to report on what is currently known about the zoonotic transmission of L. major, and to develop arguments supporting the hypothesis that humans play a potential role as "reservoir host" of the parasite, albeit a complementary one.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.