ArticleJournal of animal science2026
Genetic heterogeneity of residual variance for growth traits in American angus Cattle.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Economic incentives have increased the demand for uniformity in beef production, making it a valuable phenotype for genetic studies. Genetic heterogeneity of residual variance suggests that variability around the mean may have a genetic component and could potentially respond to selection. However, evidence for genetic control of residual variance in beef cattle remains limited. The objectives of this study were to 1) investigate genetic heterogeneity of residual variances for birth weight (BW), weaning weight (WW), and yearling weight (YW) in American Angus cattle, and 2) compare models for genetic homogeneity (M1) versus genetic heterogeneity of residual variance, including a double hierarchical generalized linear model (DHGLM, M2) and a genetically structured environmental variance model (M3). A total of 75,000 BW, 74,975 WW, and 49,803 YW records were analyzed. Genetic parameters were estimated using average information restricted maximum likelihood for models M1 and M2, whereas model M3 employed Markov chain Monte Carlo within a Bayesian framework. We found evidence of genetic variation in residual variance for all traits, although the heritability estimates for residual variance were low, ranging from 0.004 to 0.01. Estimates of the genetic coefficient of variation for residual variance ranged from 0.38 to 0.62 for BW, 0.09 to 0.25 for WW, and 0.07 to 0.25 for YW, indicating potential for selection to reduce variability. Genetic correlations between mean and residual variance were negative for BW (-0.48 in M2 and -0.49 in M3) and positive for WW and YW. These findings indicate that the implications of selection for uniformity are trait-specific. Body weight should be maintained within an optimal range, whereas selection for increased WW and YW may lead to greater variability unless residual variance is incorporated into selection decisions. Overall, our results indicate the feasibility of reducing variability through selection, representing a first step in integrating growth trait uniformity into breeding goals for beef cattle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.