Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42184179›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2026

DSA-NRP: No-Reflow Prediction From Angiographic Perfusion Dynamics in Stroke EVT.

Shreeram Athreya, Carlos Olivares, Ameera Ismail, Kambiz Nael, William Speier, Corey W Arnold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shreeram Athreya
Carlos Olivares
Ameera Ismail
Kambiz Nael
William Speier
Corey W Arnold

Funding

A Machine Learning Approach to Classifying Time Since Stroke using Medical ImagingR01NS100806 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARNOLD, COREY WELLS · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS100806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following successful large-vessel recanalization via endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), some patients experience a complication known as no-reflow, defined by persistent microvascular hypoperfusion that undermines tissue recovery and worsens clinical outcomes. Although prompt identification is crucial, standard clinical practice relies on perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 24 hours post-procedure, delaying intervention. In this work, we introduce the first-ever machine learning (ML) framework to predict no-reflow immediately after EVT by leveraging previously unexplored intra-procedural digital subtraction angiography (DSA) sequences and clinical variables. Our retrospective analysis included AIS patients treated at UCLA Medical Center (2011-2024) who achieved favorable mTICI scores (2c or 3) and underwent pre- and post-procedure MRI. No-reflow was defined as a $\gt {15}\%$ reduction in relative cerebral blood volume or flow within the infarct core compared to the contralateral hemisphere. From DSA sequences (anteroposterior and lateral views), we extracted statistical and temporal perfusion features from the target downstream territory to train ML classifiers for predicting no-reflow. Our preliminary results demonstrate that this novel method outperformed a clinical-features baseline (AUROC: 0.9330 vs. 0.7768 ( ${p} = {0}.{006}$ )), suggesting that real-time DSA perfusion dynamics may encode clinically relevant information related to microvascular integrity. This approach establishes a preliminary foundation for immediate, accurate no-reflow prediction, enabling clinicians to proactively manage high-risk patients without reliance on delayed imaging, though it warrants validation in larger, independent cohorts.

Indexed as

Angiography, Digital SubtractionEndovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeStrokeThrombectomyAgedAged, 80 and overBrainCerebrovascular CirculationFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42184179
PMCPMC13497798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.