ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
ssNetShift: single-sample metabolic network rewiring reveals hidden prognostic subtypes beyond clinical staging in gastric cancer.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current metabolomics approaches predominantly rely on group-level differential abundance screening. While effective for identifying biomarkers, this paradigm often overlooks upstream regulatory hubs and fails to resolve the inter-individual heterogeneity inherent in complex diseases. To bridge this gap, we present ssNetShift, a single-sample network framework that identifies personalized topological driver metabolites by quantifying topological rewiring rather than static concentration deviations. By integrating linear interpolation-based network estimation with an extended neighbor-shift metric, ssNetShift systematically characterizes how specific metabolites alter their connectivity and centrality within individual patient networks. We applied ssNetShift to a multicohort gastric cancer dataset comprising 389 patients and 313 controls. Benchmarking analyses demonstrated that ssNetShift consistently outperformed conventional approaches: unlike group-level methods (e.g. NetShift), it recovered survival-associated driver metabolites masked by population averaging; unlike single-sample abundance methods (e.g. personalized perturbation profiles), it prioritized silent drivers, metabolites with stable abundance but drastic topological reorganization, thereby capturing system-level dysregulation. Crucially, ssNetShift revealed hidden prognostic subtypes within the same clinical stage, separating patients with identical tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging into distinct risk classes characterized by specific metabolic wiring patterns (e.g. nucleotide and tryptophan hubs) and significantly divergent survival outcomes. Collectively, ssNetShift provides a risk stratification dimension orthogonal to traditional staging, offering a robust tool for uncovering mechanistic drivers and refining prognostic resolution in heterogeneous malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.