ArticleMycorrhiza2026
Comparative analyses of transcriptionally regulated downstream genes between arbuscular mycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal symbioses in the single host plant Eucalyptus grandis.
Article in Mycorrhiza, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In nature, some tree species interact with both arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) Glomeromycotina fungi and ectomycorrhizal (ECM) Basidiomycota/Ascomycota fungi, and are termed dual mycorrhizal plants. Although the AM-upregulated genes and their functions have been well studied, those of ECM symbiosis remain unclear, despite their essential roles in forest ecosystems. Therefore, this study aimed to compare symbiosis-regulated downstream genes in the dual mycorrhizal model tree, Eucalyptus grandis, during fully developed AM and ECM symbioses. First, we conducted a comparative transcriptomic analysis and found a distinct transcriptional profile between E. grandis AM and ECM roots. Notably, none of the examined AM-related downstream genes were upregulated in the ECM roots. To identify ECM-specific genes and their expression patterns, comparative genomic analysis was performed. This study identified several gene families, including NAC transcription factors, that significantly expanded across the examined ECM lineages. Interestingly, we identified some ECM-promoted NAC transcription factors in the ECM roots of E. grandis, Populus trichocarpa, and Castanea mollissima. Moreover, none of the Eucalyptus NAC genes were transcriptionally promoted during AM symbiosis. Taken together, our results indicate that the downstream pathways necessary for the establishment of AM and ECM symbioses would be distinct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42184013What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.