ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2026
Patterns of positron emission mammography uptake by benign and malignant breast lesions: radiopathological correlation with malignant histopathological subtypes, histological grades, and molecular subtypes.
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn the new era of nuclear breast imaging, differentiating benign from malignant uptake in the breast is essential in guiding clinical management. Accordingly, we aimed to assess the pattern of PEM uptake in benign and malignant breast lesions and to investigate its correlation with different histopathological subtypes, histological tumor grades, and molecular subtypes.
methodsThis was a prospective study comprised of 337 women with 465 breast lesions, of whom 128 patients had bilateral breast lesions. All patients performed Positron Emission Mammography (PEM) from March 2022 to February 2024. Any abnormality was evaluated qualitatively (mass and non-mass enhancement ) and quantitatively ( PUVmax and LTB ratio). The PEM readings were correlated with final pathology to differentiate benign from malignant lesions, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the discriminant ability of PUVmax and LTB ratio in distinguishing histopathological groups, histological grades, and molecular subtypes.
resultsAccording to the final pathology, 330 (71%) lesions were malignant, and 135 (29%) were benign. The ROC curve analysis showed cutoff values of 1.92 and 3.145 for PUVmax and the LTB ratio, respectively, to discriminate between benign and malignant breast lesions. Significant differences in PUVmax and LTB ratio were detected between benign lesions and histopathological types, grades, and molecular malignant subtypes. The cutoff values for PUVmax and LTB ratio from benign were 1.81 and 3.165 for Ductal carcinoma in situ, 2.09 and 3.55 for invasive duct carcinoma (IDC) 1.62 and 2.8 for invasive lobular carcinoma,1.92 & 3.165 for grade I, 1.935 & 3.145 for grade II & III tumors, 1.92 and 3.145 for luminal molecular subtype, 1.95 and 3.45 for HER 2 subtype, and 2.28 and 4.27 for the triple-negative subtype respectively. The lesions with irregular shapes, uncircumscribed margins, and segmental non-mass distribution have higher PUVmax and LTB ratios.
conclusionsPEM is a valuable imaging modality for distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions. PEM may enable stratification of malignant lesions by histopathological subtype, tumour grade, and molecular subtypes. The highest metabolic activity was observed in invasive duct carcinoma, grade III, and the triple-negative molecular subtype. Overall, PEM can provide in vivo evaluation of breast lesion metabolic activity, leading to better lesion characterization and individualized patient management. However, due to methodological constraints, subgroup sample size, and radiation exposure, PEM should be regarded as an adjunct to sonomammography rather than a primary screening imaging modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42183989What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.