ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026
A data-driven scientific approach to explore the relationship between MGMT methylation and imaging phenotype in glioblastoma.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma is a highly malignant brain tumor, and patient survival remains short despite multimodal treatment. One important prognostic factor is the methylation status of the O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene, as MGMT promoter methylation is associated with a better response to temozolomide chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between noninvasively obtained imaging features and MGMT methylation status. Magnetic resonance (MR) images and MGMT methylation data for 55 glioblastoma cases (33 methylated, 22 unmethylated) were obtained from the publicly available TCGA-GBM database. After brain morphological standardization, tumor centroid coordinates were calculated and used as inputs for a quadratic discriminant classifier to assess the separability of MGMT methylation status based on anatomical location. In addition, 279 radiomic features, including histogram- and texture-based metrics, were extracted from tumor regions. Using Lasso regression, nine features were selected and subsequently analyzed using linear discriminant analysis. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were 0.71 for anatomical location-based classification and 0.85 for radiomic feature-based classification. Because the correlation between anatomical location and radiomic features was low, integrating both feature sets improved discrimination performance to an AUC of 0.90. These results suggest that imaging examinations capture complementary information regarding tumor morphology and anatomical origin. The anatomical location of glioblastoma may therefore provide useful clues for classifying MGMT gene methylation status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42183985What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.