Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42183972›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2026

Must egalitarians oppose private healthcare?

Johann Go

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Johann GoGlobal Business School for Health, University College London (UCL), Marshgate Building, 7 Sidings Street, London, E20 2AE, UK. j.go@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0293-095X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central tenet of health equity is that access to healthcare should be responsive to need rather than patients' socioeconomic status. The idea that ability to pay can enable some people to access faster, better, or more healthcare strikes many egalitarians as clearly objectionable. This paper argues that this view is more complicated than may initially appear. While there are egalitarian reasons to oppose private healthcare, these are often less decisive than they may initially appear and prohibiting private healthcare on egalitarian grounds is likely to run afoul of egalitarianism's liberal commitments. There are several important theoretical hurdles to pass through for a successful egalitarian argument against private healthcare, which this paper aims to highlight.

Indexed as

Health EquityPrivate SectorHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPoliticsEgalitarianismHealth equityHealth justiceLiberalismPrivate healthcare

Identifiers

PMID42183972
PMCPMC13633964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.