ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2026
Formula Production and its Relation to General Language Ability in Mandarin-Speaking Autistic Children.
Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores the production of Mandarin prefabricated verbal formulae (i.e., a multiword or single-word linguistic expression that is stored and retrieved holistically as a unit from memory, rather than being generated through real-time rule-based composition) in autistic children (i.e., children with Autism Spectrum Disorder, ASD). Examples of such entrenchments are ritualized socio-cultural emblems (e.g., “Happy birthday!”) and socio-communicative formulae (e.g., “Nice to meet you”). Prior studies have shown that such formulaic sequences may be pragmatically functional in adult speech, child speech, and language pathology (e.g., in aphasia). However, verbal formulae have barely been studied in autism speech. Using an elicitation study with visual stimuli, we compared the production of formulae by Mandarin-speaking high-verbal (n = 41) and low-verbal (n = 22) children with ASD. Results showed that most formulae (~ 90%) produced by both groups were ritualized conversational sequences directly associated with the target stimuli images. The study revealed that high-verbal children with ASD produced significantly more conventional, contextually relevant, and syntactically complex formulaic expressions than low-verbal counterparts (all p < 0.01, d = 0.69–1.18), highlighting their stronger structured language skills. However, both groups showed minimal and comparable use of variant or idiosyncratic formulae (p > 0.05), suggesting shared constraints in flexible language use. Formulaic language positively predicted vocabulary (β = 0.22) and grammatical abilities (β = 0.18), but only when used verbatim or contextually, indicating its scaffolding role in ASD language development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42183923What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.