ArticleHead and neck pathology2026
Genetic Landscape of Oral Carcinoma Cuniculatum and its Histological Mimics.
Article in Head and neck pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOral carcinoma cuniculatum (CC) is a rare variant of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), characterized by a well-differentiated, burrowing invasive pattern and minimal cellular atypia. Its diagnosis is challenging owing to its bland morphology, which makes differentiation from non-neoplastic lesions difficult on biopsy. Despite this, CC often requires distinction from conventional OSCC, even in surgical specimens. Histological overlap with conventional OSCC suggests a continuous spectrum of diseases. To clarify the genetic identity of pure CC, we analyzed 23 cases of OSCC with burrowing invasive patterns and classified them into three groups: CC, conventional OSCC (SCC), and uncertain CC (UCC).
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 2002 OSCC cases from multicenter archives. From this cohort, 23 cases exhibiting a burrowing invasive pattern characteristic of CC were selected. The cases were classified into the three study groups based on the WHO diagnostic criteria, and clinicopathological features were reviewed. Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed to identify clinically significant genetic alterations, and immunohistochemical staining was also conducted.
resultsThe 23 cases were histologically classified into CC (n = 8), UCC (n = 7), and SCC (n = 8) groups. Clinically, the CC group predominantly affected the gingiva with no recurrence or metastasis. Conversely, the SCC group primarily involved the tongue and showed recurrence and metastasis. Genetic alterations were detected in 87.5% (7/8) of CC cases, with low frequencies of TP53 (12.5%) and CDKN2A (25.0%) alterations and higher frequencies of FAT1 (50.0%), NOTCH1 (37.5%), PIK3CA (37.5%), and CASP8 (50.0%) alterations. In contrast, the SCC group showed frequent TP53 (75.0%) and CDKN2A (75.0%) alterations, whereas FAT1 and NOTCH1 alterations were absent. Consistent with these findings, p53 staining revealed wild-type patterns in the CC group along with a lower Ki-67 labeling index. The UCC group exhibited intermediate clinicopathological and genetic characteristics.
conclusionThis study provides the first genetic characterization of oral CC, distinct from that of conventional OSCC. This genetic signature may contribute to the biological behavior of CC and offer a potential tool for its differential diagnosis. Further studies with larger cohorts are required to confirm the relationship between CC and conventional OSCC, and to fully elucidate the genetic landscape of CC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.