ReviewBrain structure & function2026
On the impact of tactile processing on motor cortex: how touch shapes motor behaviour.
Review in Brain structure & function, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pain suppresses corticospinal excitability, independent of tactile afferent inhibition.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to manipulate objects is a fundamental human skill that relies primarily on the motor system. However, effective object manipulation would not be possible without the continuous information provided by the somatosensory system. Cutaneous tactile feedback is particularly important when a movement must be adjusted while performing an action. Efficient interactions between the tactile and motor systems are therefore paramount for fine motor behaviour, as clearly demonstrated by the profound impairments observed following lesions to sensorimotor brain regions. However, somatosensory deficits following cortical damage have received considerably less attention than motor impairments, even though substantial evidence shows that such deficits are typically associated with poorer motor recovery and that preserved somatosensation is a strong predictor of motor outcome. This disconnect highlights a significant gap in the literature: despite the critical role of touch in shaping motor behaviour, the functional relationships between the tactile and motor systems remain inadequately characterized. In this review, we provide a unified (though not exhaustive) synthesis of the evidence pointing towards the substantial role of cutaneous tactile information in modulating motor cortical processing and, consequently, motor behaviour. We first describe, across species, the anatomical and neurophysiological connections linking somatosensory and motor systems and the nature of their interactions. We then review evidence from neuropathological studies demonstrating the severe consequences of disrupted tactile signals on motor performance. Finally, we examine the impact of short- and long-term tactile learning on motor function, highlighting its potential for developing novel tactile-to-motor rehabilitation strategies for individuals suffering from brain injury and other neurological conditions. Table of contents. Introduction 4. Anatomical connections between the somatosensory and motor cortices 8. Functional nature of sensorimotor interactions 13. Neuropathological evidence of sensorimotor interactions 19. Tactile and motor interactions in the context of motor planning and motor learning 26. Effects of tactile training on motor and sensorimotor performance 29. Conclusion and future perspectives 34. References 37.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.