Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42183882›Full record

ReviewBrain structure & function2026

On the impact of tactile processing on motor cortex: how touch shapes motor behaviour.

Antonio Zafarana, Dollyane Muret, Alessandro Farnè, Luigi Tamè

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain structure & function, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antonio ZafaranaSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NP, UK. antonio.zafarana1@gmail.com.
Dollyane MuretIntegrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, CNRS UMR 8002, Université Paris Cité, 75006, Paris, France.
Alessandro FarnèImpact Team of the Lyon Neuroscience Research Center INSERM U1028 CNRS U5292, University of Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Luigi TamèSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NP, UK. l.tame@kent.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to manipulate objects is a fundamental human skill that relies primarily on the motor system. However, effective object manipulation would not be possible without the continuous information provided by the somatosensory system. Cutaneous tactile feedback is particularly important when a movement must be adjusted while performing an action. Efficient interactions between the tactile and motor systems are therefore paramount for fine motor behaviour, as clearly demonstrated by the profound impairments observed following lesions to sensorimotor brain regions. However, somatosensory deficits following cortical damage have received considerably less attention than motor impairments, even though substantial evidence shows that such deficits are typically associated with poorer motor recovery and that preserved somatosensation is a strong predictor of motor outcome. This disconnect highlights a significant gap in the literature: despite the critical role of touch in shaping motor behaviour, the functional relationships between the tactile and motor systems remain inadequately characterized. In this review, we provide a unified (though not exhaustive) synthesis of the evidence pointing towards the substantial role of cutaneous tactile information in modulating motor cortical processing and, consequently, motor behaviour. We first describe, across species, the anatomical and neurophysiological connections linking somatosensory and motor systems and the nature of their interactions. We then review evidence from neuropathological studies demonstrating the severe consequences of disrupted tactile signals on motor performance. Finally, we examine the impact of short- and long-term tactile learning on motor function, highlighting its potential for developing novel tactile-to-motor rehabilitation strategies for individuals suffering from brain injury and other neurological conditions. Table of contents. Introduction 4. Anatomical connections between the somatosensory and motor cortices 8. Functional nature of sensorimotor interactions 13. Neuropathological evidence of sensorimotor interactions 19. Tactile and motor interactions in the context of motor planning and motor learning 26. Effects of tactile training on motor and sensorimotor performance 29. Conclusion and future perspectives 34. References 37.

Indexed as

Motor ActivityMotor CortexTouchTouch PerceptionAnimalsHumansSomatosensory CortexMotor cortexSensorimotor integrationSomatosensory cortexTactile trainingTouch

Identifiers

PMID42183882
PMCPMC13201308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.