SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Safety and efficacy of liposomal iron for iron deficiency anemia in pediatric population: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) remains a public health problem in children. Conventional iron therapy is effective but often causes gastrointestinal adverse effects that reduce adherence. Liposomal iron has been developed to enhance absorption and improve tolerability. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of liposomal iron compared with conventional iron formulations in pediatric patients with IDA. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to February 21, 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing liposomal iron with conventional oral iron in children with IDA. Analyses were performed using R software with the meta package. Continuous outcomes were pooled as mean differences (MDs) and dichotomous outcomes as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses according to follow-up duration. Four RCTs involving 454 children were included. At 6 months, liposomal iron produced a significantly greater increase in hemoglobin compared with conventional iron (MD 0.96 g/dL, 95% CI 0.09-1.82; P = 0.03), although heterogeneity was substantial (I
Indexed as
Identifiers
42183880What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.