Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42183746›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality-based interventions for alleviating peri- and post-procedural pain and anxiety in gynecologic settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Cristina González-Lara, Marina Piñar-Lara, Esteban Obrero-Gaitán, Héctor García-López, Irene Cortés-Pérez

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cristina González-LaraAsociación Engloba, Integración Laboral, Educativa y Social, Jaén, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2762-3396
Marina Piñar-LaraDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0242-7659
Esteban Obrero-GaitánDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8430-5500
Héctor García-LópezDepartment of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almería, Almería, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3160-7692
Irene Cortés-PérezDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1876-1399

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-pharmacological and complementary therapeutic, notably immersive virtual reality-based interventions (IVR), could alleviate pain and anxiety associated with gynecologic procedures.

objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of IVR in reducing peri- and post-procedural pain and anxiety in gynecologic procedures. Secondarily, to determine the safety of IVR. SEARCH STRATEGY: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted, after searching in PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science, CINAHL Complete and PEDro from database inception to September 2025 with no language or publication date restrictions set. SELECTION CRITERIA: Inclusion criteria were based on the PICOS framework: Population (patients undergoing gynecologic procedures), Intervention (IVR), Comparison (standard care or other therapeutic approaches), Outcomes (pain, anxiety and adverse events) and Study design (randomized controlled trials [RCTs]). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Pooled effects were calculated using Cohen's standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) in a random-effects model. Potential adverse events during IVR exposure were also compiled. MAIN

resultsA total of 25 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comprising data from 2438 women (mean age 35.3 ± 12.6 years), were included. Intraprocedural outcomes indicated that IVR significantly decreased both pain (SMD = -0.46, 95% CI: -0.71 to -0.21, P < 0.001) and anxiety (SMD = -0.33, 95% CI: -0.63 to -0.03, P = 0.031). Post-procedurally, IVR yielded further reductions in pain (SMD = -0.81, 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.5, P < 0.001) and anxiety (SMD = -0.76, 95% CI: -1.22 to -0.3, P = 0.001). Reported adverse events were minor and infrequent.

conclusionThis meta-analysis suggests that IVR serves as a highly effective and safe non-pharmacological adjunct for mitigating peri- and post-procedural pain and anxiety in gynecologic settings. Translating these findings into clinical practice could substantially enhance patient care and overall experience. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD420251000835.

Indexed as

AnxietyGynecologic Surgical ProceduresPain ManagementPostoperative PainProcedural PainVirtual RealityVirtual Reality Exposure TherapyFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcomeanxietygynecologic proceduresimmersive virtual realitymeta‐analysisobstetrical and gynecologicpainvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID42183746
PMCPMC13674823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.