Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42183732›Full record

Trial reportJournal of radiation research2026

Acute skin toxicity and cosmesis outcome in non-metastatic breast cancer patients treated with ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy: a randomized controlled phase II clinical trial comparing proton versus photon radiotherapy.

Thanaporn Sarsitthithum, Chonnipa Nantavithya, Chawalit Lertbutsayanukul, Kitwadee Saksornchai

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of radiation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thanaporn SarsitthithumDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, RamaIV Road, Pathum Wan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Chonnipa NantavithyaDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, RamaIV Road, Pathum Wan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Chawalit LertbutsayanukulDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, RamaIV Road, Pathum Wan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Kitwadee SaksornchaiDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, RamaIV Road, Pathum Wan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5461-8661

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 1-week photon radiotherapy schedule of 26 Gy in 5 fractions is as safe and effective as the standard 3-week schedule of 40 Gy in 15 fractions for adjuvant local radiotherapy in early stage breast cancer. Proton radiotherapy offers dosimetric advantages by reducing heart and lung dose but may be associated with increased acute skin toxicity, and the acute toxicity of ultra-hypofractionated proton therapy remains unknown. In this randomized trial, non-metastatic breast cancer patients were assigned to receive either proton or photon radiotherapy at a dose of 26 Gy in 5 fractions delivered on alternate days, with the aim of comparing acute skin toxicity between the two modalities. Of 140 eligible patients, 72 were included in this interim analysis, with 36 patients in each treatment arm. The highest observed toxicity was grade 2 radiation dermatitis, which occurred in one patient in the proton arm. The incidence of acute radiation dermatitis was significantly higher in the proton arm than in the photon arm (97.2% vs. 75%, P = 0.006), while no significant differences were observed in other acute toxicities. Patients treated with photon radiotherapy demonstrated better cosmetic outcomes (41.7% vs. 13.9%, P = 0.007) and higher satisfaction scores (80.6% vs. 58.3%, P = 0.04) compared with those treated with proton radiotherapy. At a median follow-up of 9 months (IQR: 6-11), no locoregional recurrence was observed in either treatment arm. This interim analysis indicates that ultra-hypofractionated proton therapy is associated with a higher incidence of mild acute radiation dermatitis, whereas photon radiotherapy results in superior cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction, with longer follow-up required to determine long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPhotonsProton TherapyRadiodermatitisAdultAgedDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleHumansMiddle AgedTreatment Outcomebreast cancerbreast radiotherapyhypofractionatedproton therapy

Identifiers

PMID42183732
PMCPMC13400564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.