Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42183643›Full record

Trial reportJournal of Parkinson's disease2026

Baseline predictors of response to a group-based speech and communication intervention in Parkinson's disease: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Hanna Steurer, Ellika Schalling, Erika Franzén, Joakim Körner Gustafsson, Franziska Albrecht

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03213873 (Effects of the HiBalance-program), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03213873 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of the HiBalance-program: Linking Clinical Signs and Symptoms to Changes in the Brain in People With Parkinson´s Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2017 to 2019Enrolled95ConditionsParkinson Disease, Physical Activity, Gait Disorders, Neurologic, Neural DegenerationArmsHiBalance, Speech and communication therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hanna SteurerDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Speech and Language Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6317-898X
Ellika SchallingDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Speech and Language Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Erika FranzénResearch & Development Unit, Stockholms Sjukhem, Stockholm, Sweden.
Joakim Körner GustafssonDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Speech and Language Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Franziska AlbrechtDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5891-445X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundSpeech and voice symptoms are common in Parkinson's disease, yet predictors of response to behavioral speech interventions are unclear.ObjectivesTo identify predictors of responsiveness to a speech and communication group-intervention (HiCommunication) and contextualize findings against active controls.MethodsThis secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial included intervention completers. Responders were defined for voice intensity (increase ≥2 decibels) and voice quality (Acoustic Voice Quality Index decrease ≥0.54). Nineteen baseline clinical, motor, cognitive, perceptual, and acoustic variables were entered into Random Forest classifiers. Primary models excluded the baseline value of the target domain; baseline-including variants were sensitivity analyses. Performance was evaluated using Cohen's kappa, precision, recall, and specificity; key predictors were examined using partial dependence.ResultsIn HiCommunication (n = 35), the primary voice intensity model showed moderate agreement (kappa = 0.57; precision = 0.79; recall = 0.90; specificity = 0.64). Higher baseline perceptual ratings of reduced loudness and overall speech deviation, as well as higher Acoustic Voice Quality Index values, were associated with a higher predicted probability of improvement in voice intensity, whereas higher levodopa equivalent daily dose was associated with a lower response probability; postural instability/gait difficulty or tremor-dominant motor phenotypes showed higher response probability than the indeterminate phenotype. Voice quality models were below chance without baseline Acoustic Voice Quality Index but reached kappa 0.38 when included. Active control models showed low performance.ConclusionsClinically accessible baseline measures predicted improvement in voice intensity following HiCommunication with moderate accuracy. Perceptual ratings may support expectation-setting and individualized planning of group-based speech intervention in Parkinson's disease, but findings require replication.ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03213873, doi: 10.1177/1545968321999053Plain Language TitleWho benefits most from group-based speech and communication therapy in Parkinson's disease? This study explored whether simple clinical and speech measures collected before treatment can help predict which people with Parkinson's disease are most likely to improve their voice loudness after participating in an intensive group-based speech and communication program.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareParkinson DiseasePsychotherapy, GroupSpeech TherapyVoice DisordersVoice QualityAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParkinson's diseaseprecision rehabilitationrandom forestspeech interventionvoice

Identifiers

PMID42183643
PMCPMC13435197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.