ArticleAnnals of neurosciences2026
Functional Disability and Loneliness Among Clinically Stable Individuals with Schizophrenia: A Cross-sectional Study.
Article in Annals of neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Functional disability and loneliness frequently persist among clinically stable individuals with schizophrenia, thereby impeding recovery and restricting social participation. Purpose: This study assessed functional disability and loneliness in clinically stable individuals with schizophrenia and to examine their associations with socio-demographic variables and employment status. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with 50 clinically stable individuals with schizophrenia, aged 18 to 60 years. Data were collected using socio-demographic schedule, the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), and the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Results: The mean loneliness and WHODAS scores were 43.16 ± 11.96 and 74.28 ± 14.65, respectively. No significant differences were observed by gender or domicile. Participants from joint families showed higher disability in self-care (p = .005), household activities (p = .041), and participation (p = .007). Duration of unemployment was positively correlated with disability (r = 0.311-0.517, p < .05), whereas employment duration was negatively correlated with disability in interpersonal, work, and participation domains. Conclusion: Unemployment and joint family dynamics are associated with increased disability, underscoring the importance of vocational rehabilitation and family-focused psychosocial interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.