ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
When good citizens do bad things for their organization: examining the link between organizational citizenship behavior and unethical pro-organizational behavior.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) is generally regarded as a positive form of extra-role behavior that supports organizational effectiveness. However, engaging in OCB also requires self-regulatory effort, which may make employees more prone to unethical pro-organizational behavior. Drawing on the resource model of self-control, this study examines when and why OCB may have this unintended effect. Methods: A moderated mediation model was employed to investigate the impact of OCB on unethical pro-organizational behavior. The hypothesized framework was tested using two-wave survey data drawn from 376 employees in Chinese enterprises. Results: The results show that OCB has a significant positive effect on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Ego depletion partly explains this relationship, indicating that engaging in OCB consumes employees' self-control resources, which in turn increases the likelihood of unethical pro-organizational behavior. Moreover, this indirect relationship becomes stronger when job insecurity is high. Discussion: These findings reveal the paradoxical nature of OCB. Although it is generally regarded as beneficial, it may also entail ethical costs. The study therefore offers a more nuanced understanding of discretionary behavior and its potential ethical risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.