ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
How AI literacy predicts L2 Chinese writing engagement: the mediating roles of anxiety and enjoyment.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the era of Generative AI, the focus of second language (L2) writing research has shifted toward how learners' AI literacy shapes their affective experiences and engagement. Drawing upon the Control-Value Theory (CVT), this study investigated the mechanisms underlying the relationship between L2 Chinese Writing AI Literacy and L2 Engagement, with L2 Writing Anxiety and L2 Writing Enjoyment as mediating variables. Methods: The study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. In the quantitative phase, structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted with 408 L2 Chinese learners. In the subsequent qualitative phase, Stimulated Recall Diaries (SRD) and Stimulated Recall Interviews (SRI) were conducted with eight participants to gain an in-depth understanding of their emotional trajectories. Results: Quantitative results confirmed that L2 Chinese Writing AI Literacy significantly predicted L2 Engagement both directly and indirectly. Specifically, AI literacy served as a powerful affective regulator, significantly reducing L2 anxiety by enhancing learners' perceived control and thereby boosting writing engagement. Qualitative findings revealed that AI literacy empowered learners to transition from anxious novices to confident editors, where the exercise of selective agency became a primary source of control. Discussion: Overall, the study highlights the role of L2 Chinese Writing AI Literacy as an emotional buffer for creative agency in technologically enhanced writing environments. The findings offer critical pedagogical implications for fostering AI literacy and developing differentiated scaffolding strategies to optimize L2 Chinese writing development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.