ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Relatedness as a contextual catalyst in motor learning: the socially embedded motor learning framework.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motor learning research has predominantly modeled the learner as an isolated information processor, yielding robust insights into practice schedules and feedback design while leaving the social conditions of skill acquisition comparatively underexamined. This article applies Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to reframe motor learning as a socially embedded process and advances the hypothesis that relatedness-understood here as the learner's sense of being cared for, respected, and connected to relevant others-functions as a contextual catalyst shaping how autonomy and competence support translate into learning gains. Three testable propositions are advanced: (a) an amplification hypothesis, predicting that autonomy- and competence-supportive practices yield stronger learning effects when relatedness satisfaction is high; (b) a safety-to-exploration pathway, positing that psychological safety mediates the relation between relatedness satisfaction and adaptive learning behaviors such as error tolerance and strategic variability; and (c) a cooperative-structure advantage, proposing that dyadic and team-based formats outperform individual practice when they support relatedness satisfaction and enable informational dialogue. Boundary conditions are also identified-task complexity, expertise level, cultural context, and evaluation pressure-under which these effects may vary, attenuate, or reverse. These ideas are integrated into the Socially Embedded Motor Learning (SEML) framework, together with a methodological agenda emphasizing multi-session designs, multilevel analysis, and psychophysiological or neurocognitive measurement. Practical implications for coaches, physical educators, and rehabilitation professionals are also outlined. By making the social dimension of motor learning theoretically explicit and empirically testable, the SEML framework offers a research program linking motivational psychology, motor control, and pedagogy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.